Commentary on Le Corre & Carey
نویسنده
چکیده
The experiments reported by Le Corre and Carey were designed to test a form of the analog mapping hypothesis, but not to test the hypothesis advanced by Gallistel and Gelman (1992). Our hypothesis is that very early in the prolonged process of learning verbal counting children recognize that the structure and function of verbal counting are the same as the structure and function of their pre-verbal counting system. Both processes honor the one-one, stable order, and cardinal principles, and both processes deliver symbols that are subject to arithmetic processing. Gelman and her coauthors (Gelman, 1998; Gelman & Lucariello, 2002; Gelman & Williams, 1998) have argued that this recognition of common structure and function is mediated by a more general process that she calls structure mapping, which plays an important role in many other aspects of cognitive development. The Gallistel and Gelman (1992) hypothesis is that it is the early recognition that there is a mapping of both structure and function that drives the long, slow process of learning the bidirectional maps – the mapping from the mental magnitudes to the corresponding count words and the mapping from the count words to the corresponding mental magnitudes. The process of learning these two mappings never goes to completion in that count words like ‘million’, ‘billion’, and ‘trillion’ probably do not map to useable mental magnitudes in most adults. On our hypothesis, counting is a numerically meaningful activity even in children who are very bad counters. They already understand that counting yields a word that represents cardinality and that words representing cardinality are principal players in talk about arithmetic operations, such as addition and subtraction. Thus, we take
منابع مشابه
Sub-curvilinear Gullies Interpreted as Evidence for Transient Water Flow on Vesta
VESTA. J. E. C. Scully, C. T. Russell, A. Yin , R. Jaumann, E. Carey, H. Y. McSween, J. Castillo-Rogez, C. A. Raymond, V. Reddy, L. Le Corre, Dept. of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA ([email protected]), DLR, Berlin, Germany, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, Max ...
متن کاملAn investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles
Since the publication of [Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.] seminal work on the development of verbal counting as a representation of number, the nature of the ontogenetic sources of the verbal counting principles has been intensely debated. The present experiments explore proposals according to which the verbal...
متن کاملAnalogue Magnitudes and Knower-Levels: Re-Visiting the Variability Argument
What cognitive system(s) initially provide the numerical content that defines the cardinal number words for young children? Le Corre and Carey (2007) argued that the answer cannot be the analogue magnitude system. Here we reexamine the most powerful of their arguments, which concerned the system’s signature scalar variability (the standard deviation of answers grows linearly with the mean). Usi...
متن کاملOne, Two, Three, Four, Nothing More: An Investigation of the Conceptual Sources of the Verbal Counting Principles
The culturally widespread verbal count list (“one, two, three...”), deployed in accord with what Gelman & Gallistel (1978) call the “counting principles,” represents the positive integers1. The counting principles provide an account of how the count list encodes the successor function; i.e. if a numeral “n” refers to cardinal value n and “p” immediately follows “n” in the count list then “p” re...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006